New Paths to ParenthoodAs infertility treatment technology advances, more Americans are turning to assisted reproduction. Here, we look at some of the choices families are making. by Elizabeth Larsen
After trying for years to have children, Mark and Lucy Johnson* acknowledged a hard fact: Even if they could determine the cause of Lucy's infertility, her eggs were probably too old to warrant their trying in-vitro fertilization (IVF). "I felt like my body had failed me," she says. They could either pursue adoption or try for a pregnancy using eggs donated by a younger woman.
"I'd heard of sperm banks, but not egg donors," Lucy remembers. "I didn't think it was something I'd ever have to do, but I decided that I wanted this child to have some of Mark. It was also important to me to be pregnant."
The Johnsons faced a few roadblocks. Their upfront expenses--$5,000 to the donor, $12,000 to the fertility clinic, $5,000 for medications, $6,000 for the egg-donation agency's program fee--were not covered by insurance. After their first donor backed out, it took them eight months to save $8,000 for a second try with a new donor.
Despite their bumpy road to parenthood, today, 45-year-old Lucy is a happy cliché of an expectant mother. Due in less than two months, she's attending showers and shopping for onesies. She can barely believe her good fortune. Science has given her and Mark something they were beginning to think they might never have.
Growing in popularity As international adoption becomes more difficult, and the unpredictability of being "chosen" by a domestic birthmother makes some prospective parents anxious, more people are turning to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to create their families. Some use donor sperm, a practice that's quietly been taking place for centuries. Others implant eggs from younger women or frozen embryos left over from another couple's IVF procedure. Still others employ gestational carriers (in the U.S. and, increasingly, abroad, because of reduced costs) to bear a child conceived from their egg and sperm. (Unlike a "surrogate," a gestational carrier has no genetic link to the child she is carrying.)
Reports published annually by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that assisted reproduction is on the rise. In the U.S., there were 146,244 ART cycles performed in 2009, compared with 99,629 in 2000. In 2009, 60,190 infants who were conceived using ART were born, versus 35,025 in 2000. Shady Grove Fertility Center, a clinic with offices throughout the Washington, D.C., area, initiated more than 2,500 donor-egg treatment cycles from 2007 to March 2011.
Melissa Brisman, a New Jersey attorney who facilitates pregnancies through egg donation, embryo transfer, and gestational carriers, says that, in 2000, she negotiated about 20 gestational-carrier births. Now that number is between 200 and 300 annually. Diane Michelsen, a California attorney who facilitates family-building through ART, estimates that in 2000 her practice was 40 percent ART and 60 percent adoption. Those figures have now flipped.
Choosing assisted reproduction While the considerations of raising a child who is not genetically related to either or both parents are similar to those faced by adoptive families, reproductive technologies are so new that there is currently no consensus about best practices. "This is pioneer territory," says Joni Mantell, LCSW, CSW, director of the New Jersey-based Infertility and Adoption Counseling Center. "In adoption, we think in terms of the child's best interests. With ART, the starting point is the desire and need of the parents."
Many prospective parents who choose to get pregnant with donated sperm, eggs, or embryos have spent years coping with infertility, or have lived through the heartbreak of a failed adoption. "They want control back," says Mantell. "Women may want to carry the baby, eat the right food, and plan for the child's birth. Men may want to nurture a pregnant wife."
Practical considerations were a big plus for Carol Jean Feth, the mother of an 11-year-old biological son, a six-year-old son conceived from a donor egg, and a 14-month-old daughter who was adopted from Guatemala. "With egg donation, you experience a pregnancy and all the joys that brings," she says. "Another big ‘pro' is that you know when your new bundle is going to arrive, and can gear your preparation toward that date. In adoption, you have very little time to prepare after getting ‘the call.'"
Some parents, like the Johnsons, want the genetic connection to one partner, as well as the emotional experience of carrying a baby. Although Lucy admits to moments when she thinks, "This isn't my kid I'm carrying," being pregnant is cementing her attachment. "I feel very connected to the baby," she says. "Our bond is growing every day."
Maintaining contact Just as adoptive families wonder about the kind of relationship they will have with their children's birthparents, parents using ART have to decide whether or not they will maintain contact with the people who helped them create their families.
Although most ART procedures, with the exception of gestational carriers, are based in anonymity, donors may agree to some level of identification or contact, and many parents write thank-you notes, send gifts, or meet their donors. In Everything Conceivable (Anchor Books), an engaging analysis of the cultural implications of ART, author Liza Mundy describes a baptism ceremony for triplets, where the guest of honor was the children's egg donor.
Tamara and Joseph Bove enjoy a close bond with one of their two gestational carriers. The relationship with their first carrier faded after a few years, and they are no longer in contact. But their bond with the second carrier grew as the pregnancy progressed. "From the beginning, we were hoping to develop a friendship," says Tamara. "But we didn't know whether we would. You don't have the opportunity to get to know the person before you start working with her." Over time, they discovered many shared values. The Boves named their only daughter after her carrier.
The reality of those potential relationships has yet to be worked out on a larger scale. "There's a schism here, and people go to either end of the spectrum," says Michelsen. "Some parents are grateful for someone else's efforts [on their behalf]. Others think of ART as a business transaction. They think, ‘I want this baby to be delivered to me safely. I don't need a connection with you.'"
Total anonymity, however, can lead to medical complications down the line. The story of a California girl who was born with Tay-Sachs disease, which she inherited from both her father and the egg donor, has led some leaders in the fertility industry to advocate for a national registry to track donors and birth outcomes. In a report released in early February, the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute called for a national database to facilitate access to birth and medical information for donor-conceived offspring.
Sorting through the ethics While it's true that many donors and gestational carriers are motivated by a desire to help infertile couples, others see ART as a way to make money. The average payment to a gestational carrier is $30,000. Egg donors usually receive $5,000 to $10,000, or more. A 2010 article in The Wall Street Journal reports that inquiries about selling eggs or becoming a gestational carrier have surged during this tough economic time.
Embryos are generally donated by genetic parents after they've had a successful round of IVF. That can be a tricky proposition, as some parents retain an emotional connection to their embryos. "Many people get cold feet about donating an embryo anonymously," says Michelsen. "They have second thoughts about their child having a full sibling they may never meet."
Embryo transfer has also sparked controversy along the pro-choice/pro-life divide. Those who consider embryos to be more than human tissue, because they have the potential to become human life, may refer to the practice as "embryo adoption." Such "adoptions" include homestudies, and allow the genetic parents to choose who receives their embryos, but do not involve a legally recognized adoption process.
Parents considering an embryo transfer must weigh additional factors into their decision-making. "Clinics use the best embryos first," says Michelsen. "Embryos that are frozen tend to be of a lower quality, and IVF cycles are expensive." Another ethical issue arises from the fact that embryos are usually frozen in groups. To defrost one, you have to defrost them all. If there are three embryos in a group, is it acceptable to implant only one or two and destroy the rest? "Are you looking at the possibilities of triplets?" Michelsen asks. "Or are you looking at selective reduction?" These issues have to be negotiated by donor and recipient.
Explaining ART to children Another question that prospective parents face is how to handle talking with their children about the way they entered the world. In adoptive families, a child's adoption is usually talked about from the time she enters her family, but sperm and egg donation and embryo transfers often allow non-genetic parents to "pass" as genetic parents.
Read All About ART An illustrated storybook can pave the way to explaining tough topics, like assisted reproduction, to young children. Read the books during storytime, or peruse them for conversation openers and suggested language.
The Kangaroo Pouch, by Sarah Phillips Pellet (Trafford). A kangaroo offers to carry a baby in her pouch for a childless couple. The gestational carrier's child narrates this tale.
Mommy, Was Your Tummy Big?, by Carolina Nadel (MooKind Press). A mother elephant explains donor-egg reproduction to her child. Sweet language and warm watercolor illustrations round out this touching story.
A Tiny Itsy Bitsy Gift of Life, by Carmen Martinez Jover (carmenmartinezjover. com). Two rabbits longing for a family are given a tiny "seed." They join it with the husband's "seed" to grow their own baby bunny.
Hope & Will Have a Baby, by Irene Celcer (Graphite Press; 4 titles). The books in this series share the same beginning and happy ending. Midway through each book, the author uses straightforward language to explain a different reproductive option.
Before You Were Born…, by Janice Grimes (X, Y, and Me; 14 titles). A father (or mother) bear tells his child the story of her beginnings and birth. The simple dialogue, accompanied by scenes of everyday life in the bears' house, helps normalize the discussion.
|
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine advises parents to be honest with their children. While the group's reasoning is grounded in medical practicality--complete health histories help people get better health care--adoption research has shown that people have an inherent and healthy interest in their biological origins. "Secrets are not good for families," says Mantell. "If someone tells a child that he looks just like his mom, and he sees his mom [who used a donor egg] cringe, he will know that she's hiding something."
When to tell, how to tell, and what to share? Do you go into the science of assisted reproduction? Do you say that you paid your donor or gestational carrier? Parents must deal with all these questions.
Some experts recommend starting these conversations as early as possible. When Janice Grimes worked as a nurse in an IVF clinic, she asked her colleagues how they advised parents to talk with their children about the way they were conceived. When she saw there was nothing written on the topic, she took matters into her own hands and published the Before You Were Born… book series (xyandme.com). Geared toward children between the ages of three and five, the books cover a range of scenarios, from a single dad who uses a donor egg and a gestational carrier to a mother and father who use a frozen embryo.
Grimes presents the concepts in easy-to-understand nuggets. In her book explaining donor eggs, she writes: "A special cell from Mommy and a special cell from Daddy must join together to make a baby. The baby then grows in a safe place inside Mommy. Sometimes a Mommy might not have the special cell she needs. The doctor said there was a nice lady called a donor. She would give us one of her cells to help us make a baby."
"It's important to us that each child know his or her special story," says Lisa Norton, who adopted two children from China, and conceived one child biologically and another with a donor egg. "But I hadn't anticipated how difficult it would be to introduce the concept of donor eggs." Norton "plunged in" with an explanation when her daughter was eight, but knows that more talks are in store. "On the eve of my daughter's tenth birthday, she asked whether a particular trait came from me or my husband. I reminded her that I couldn't have passed it on because she doesn't have my genes. In a typically preteen way, she replied, ‘Oh, yeah, I knew that.' Whew! We are not finished with this conversation, but at least we have begun."
Plunging in and following your child's lead may be the best way to talk about it, as there are no longitudinal studies or tried-and-tested talking points. "The answers to these questions are just beginning to be developed, and will be refined over time, with the same kind of trial and error that adoptive parents have been through, and with the same need for feedback from kids who have lived it," says Mantell. While finding the right words can be hard, Mantell believes that children are usually less conflicted by the topic than their parents are. She worked with a family who had two biological kids, as well as twins conceived using donor eggs. The mother felt they had to tell their kids, but her husband didn't agree. After counseling, they agreed to tell their children, and the parents are now glad they did. "One of the children conceived from donor eggs had an intuitive sense that something was off," Mantell says. "She didn't look like her sisters."
Tamara Bove feels that her triplets benefited greatly from watching the process of her twins being carried by and born to a gestational carrier. "My kids know that most people have babies in their belly, but that my belly is broken," she says. "For my kids, this is just the way we did it in our family. It feels perfectly fine and natural."
Brisman says that the parents she has worked with in her practice have come to similar conclusions. "However you get your children, you love them," she says. "At the end of the day, you don't think about how hard it was to get them."
Elizabeth Larsen is a freelance writer who specializes in adoption. Her work has appeared in Utne Reader and Mother Jones.
*names have been changed to preserve privacy.
ART Overview
| |
Donor Sperm |
Donor Egg |
Embryo Transfer |
Gestational Surrogacy |
| Typical cost |
$200 to $700 per insemination |
$15,000 to $40,000 (includes donor fee and medical and legal expenses) |
$3,000 to $5,000 for the frozen embryo transfer; if "adopting," an additional $5,000 to $15,000 for program fee and homestudy |
$30,000 to $120,000 for gestational surrogacy in the U.S. (includes carrier's fee and medical and legal expenses) |
| Genetic link to |
Mother, or to neither parent if used with donor egg |
Father, or to neither parent if used with donor sperm |
Neither parent |
Both parents; only mother (with donor sperm) or only father (with donor egg); neither (with donor embryo) |
| Do parents have to complete a homestudy? |
No |
No |
No, although some agencies require homestudies |
Not usually |
| Is there a relinquishment of parental rights and an adoption? |
No |
No |
No |
Not usually, unless required by state law; in many states, parents obtain a pre-birth parentage order |
Back To Home Page ©2013 Adoptive Families. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. |
Comments
Many assisted reproductive technologies are unethical and a human rights violation. Sperm donors and egg donors should not be payed. It is wrong to conceive a child for financial gain. "Donation" is the wrong term since true donation means that the giver does not receive money. Many of these techniques are medically risky for the child, the biological parent, and the pregnant woman. A child conceived by "donor" gametes is conceived by a man and woman who are not married to each other, and are strangers to each other. It is an out-of-wedlock pregnancy. If a married couple chooses to conceive a child this way, they are violating their marriage vows. A child has a human right to know the identity of his biological parents and siblings. The child should not have to join a registry to find this information. This information should be given to the child at birth. Anonymous "donation" and paying someone for "donating" is emotionally complex and painful for the child. Parents who choose to conceive a child this way are asking their child to make sacrifices for them and that is wrong. It is the parents' job to make sacrifices for the children and not the other way around. Children deserve to be conceived with respect and dignity.
Posted by: LindaKingston at 7:36pm Apr 15
I feel Science has stepped over the line here and is playing God. A woman who sells her eggs for money is a creep. How would you like to know at age 20 oh by the way honey I am not your biological mother. Your real mother donated her egg you to me. Do you think it is right. You only see the couple that wanted a child's side. We are really going to mess up human genetic line now because too many woman are doing this. It is disgusting. It's too bad if you can't have kids biological on your own but they say life is not fair. People need to accept that and stop being selfish. My cousin has two girls she is carrying now in her tummy that are from donated eggs. She wants everyone to think they are hers biolgically but word slipped out that they were donated. She is 45 years old. I disagree with this method. How dare someone do this. How dare Science do something imoral as this. You want a kid bad enough go adopt. Those girls will grow up living a lie. They will be devastated to learn that they lived a lie. Psychially they will know someone is missing. My mother committed adultery. I found out that at 24 years old my father was not my father. It hurt like hell. I don't buy in to this BS that oh I am doing this couple a favor. You gave up your kids for money. In the book the Good Earth they did the same. They sold their child for food. It is inhuman and appaling and there will be consequences. My cousin keeps crying when she tells everyone she is having twins. It looks like she has guilt. Her husband pushed her into it. She will pay a price. She really feels like she is committing a lie. The government is no good in this country because they are not demanding women tell these babies the truth. It is sad.
Posted by: Pat at 8:54pm Sep 24
Wow, Pat, what is WRONG with you? Are you also opposed to sperm donors? For that matter, how is egg donation ethically different than adoption? I don't see any problem with helping a woman who desperately wants a baby to have one. My father is not my biological father, but 1,000 times a parent than my biological father ever has been. You are letting your prejudices and ignorance completely warp your mind. You also need to brush up on your literature. In "The Good Earth," they did NOT sell their child. She lived with her father and was later put in the care of her father's young mistress. Besides, children who were sold in those days were sold as SLAVES. Your comparison is completely invalid. Really, I find it incredibly distasteful and disgusting that you abhor women who take extra measures to carry and have a child. Clearly if you're shelling out $10,000 for a baby, you're going to love it and treat it very well. You need to get over your "biology is everything" kick and figure out what it really means to be a parent. It's not about whose genes you have, but who loves you and takes care of you. "Living a lie," it's "selfish" to want a child. Good God. Get a grip and give me a break.
Posted by: Lily at 8:46pm Dec 31
Pat, you are the one who is living a lie. Many people are raised in homes where they have no genetic ties to their parents or family. It has been this way for centuries. It would be the same if someone adopted a child, instead of using donor egg or donor sperm. Genetics are not everything. I would bet your judgmental attitude turns off quite a number of people.
Posted by: Linda J at 2:42pm Mar 20
I agree with Pat. Pat never said genetics were everything. She is only saying that honesty is important and children have human rights. Donor gametes are not like adoption. In adoption, it is about making the best of a difficult situation. Adoption is about putting a child's needs first. Adoption starts with an unplanned pregnancy. The use of donor gametes starts with the selfish desires of adults.
Posted by: linda kingston at 7:14pm Jun 13
I have written a blog with information about ethics. I wrote two articles. One is about the reasons I decided not to conceive a child with donor sperm, and the other is about the differences in choosing to adopt and choosing to conceive by donor sperm. My blog is at: http://spermdi.blogspot.com
Posted by: linda kingston at 4:56am Sep 15
First, thank you to Adoptive Families for posting information concerning ART techniques that are becoming more commonly used. Whether or not a reader chooses to pursue those options, it is good to know the information and be informed nonetheless. Whether pursuing adoption or ART, few decisions are made lightly. What I find unfortunate is the holier-than-thou judgment being passed by those who, one would think, would be more sympathetic to the plight of those facing infertility. I suppose the temptation of labeling or judging people and/or procedures as unethical, evil, or immoral based on the values of the one passing judgment must be overwhelming. The issue isn't that two people have differing opinions, it's that one is assumed to be the blanket statement of correctness in all situations. It is fairly evident from the responses of Pat and Linda Kingston that there is little to no room for learning or debate with them, which is unfortunate. But for the rest of us who want to keep learning and growing intellectually, please keep posting articles such as this one. Regardless of whether or not people agree with the technologies being used, it won't stop those technologies from being used. Ultimately, there will be a need to explain these procedures and choices to the children involved. I certainly would rather have those resources available than a generation grow up in shame, confusion, and anger, like many closed adoptions of old.
Posted by: Michelle D at 11:54am Oct 19
Post a comment